<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten reason why wives nag their husbands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/index.php/2005/11/15/ten-reason-why-wives-nag-their-husbands/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/index.php/2005/11/15/ten-reason-why-wives-nag-their-husbands</link>
	<description>Afterwords on books, writing and columns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 04:07:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rig Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/index.php/2005/11/15/ten-reason-why-wives-nag-their-husbands/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Rig Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/?p=17#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m definitely in the the #4 category.  
On a historical context, please not that even after the libbers did their thing in the 60&#039;s and onward, burning their bras, etc. -- we still find that ERA stands for &quot;earned run average&quot;, not &quot;Equal Rights Amendment&quot;
Rig</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely in the the #4 category.<br />
On a historical context, please not that even after the libbers did their thing in the 60&#8217;s and onward, burning their bras, etc. &#8212; we still find that ERA stands for &#8220;earned run average&#8221;, not &#8220;Equal Rights Amendment&#8221;<br />
Rig</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contraryscotsman</title>
		<link>http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/index.php/2005/11/15/ten-reason-why-wives-nag-their-husbands/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Contraryscotsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/?p=17#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Is Maureen Dowd Necessary?
The Times op-ed columnist adds nothing to the debate between the sexes.

http://www.slate.com/id/2129290/

&quot;Much of what Dowd observes in the piece is trueâ€”the nostalgic passion for the 1950s, the increasing number of educated women opting to be housewives or change their names when they marry, the success of books like &#039;The Rules&#039;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Maureen Dowd Necessary?<br />
The Times op-ed columnist adds nothing to the debate between the sexes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2129290/" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2129290/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Much of what Dowd observes in the piece is trueâ€”the nostalgic passion for the 1950s, the increasing number of educated women opting to be housewives or change their names when they marry, the success of books like &#8216;The Rules&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan McQuagge</title>
		<link>http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/index.php/2005/11/15/ten-reason-why-wives-nag-their-husbands/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan McQuagge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 06:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theduncansonline.com/elderstatesman/?p=17#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Male bashing has become the popular brunt of jokes in TV sitcoms, TV advertising (just look at them with that in mind), and now on the internet. That&#039;s what we got when we encouraged &quot;women&#039;s liberation&quot;. It&#039;s called the -----fication of the American male. They think it&#039;s funny until they need someone to protect or take care of them--oh, I forgot, they can do that themselves now, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Male bashing has become the popular brunt of jokes in TV sitcoms, TV advertising (just look at them with that in mind), and now on the internet. That&#8217;s what we got when we encouraged &#8220;women&#8217;s liberation&#8221;. It&#8217;s called the &#8212;&#8211;fication of the American male. They think it&#8217;s funny until they need someone to protect or take care of them&#8211;oh, I forgot, they can do that themselves now, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

